Acts of terror as seen recently in Paris seem to rock the
world. Though as stories like this flood the media, it seems to create
extensive doors to the topic of terrorist groups and what can be done. It even unties
thousands of people from several countries as all reach out in aide, and
rightfully so.
However, while attacks like the one on Charlie Hebdo become
known hours or even minutes after it happened, there are hundreds of attacks
that never even get noticed. Thus, it is becoming clearer that more attention
needs to be paid to the severely unbalanced reporting done on terrorist
attacks.
A tragic example of this comes from the recent gruesome
attacks in Baga by the Islamist militant group Boko Haram. These attacks went
unnoticed even to me until I was alerted to a story covered by Brooke
Gladstone. Even the Nigerian government, who reached out to Paris remained
silent on the horror inside their own country. This seems to be a tragic but
perfect example of gatekeeping the media. What is presented on National news
about this issue is being kept from putting forth the whole story, or as stated
before with the Nigerian government’s silence, putting forth the story at all.
Another good point that came up in the interview was that
these depictions of terror are not even really considered news anymore. One
reason Charlie Hebdo garnered so much attention was that acts of terror are not
prominent in Paris. Yet attacks in war stricken areas such as Baga are almost
commonplace, thus not even considered a new story to report. With so much to
report inside of war torn areas like this, people are too desensitized to the
idea of violence and terror regardless if it cost more lives than in those lost
in attacks in less common areas, like Paris. This is the main problem that
needs to be addressed in media coverage on terror. Keeping the information out
of the mainstream media because it happens too often seems like an even better
reason to encourage more coverage. This way the public can become more informed
of the frequent acts of terror, and those impacted by it can be heard. Then, possibly aide or actions to stop can begin.
Media coverage leads to not just news websites but rocks
social media, the attacks of Charlie Hebdo created two hash tags on twitter
that spread the word and support about the attacks like wildfire. Yet there is
no social media movement to show support or promote awareness to the attacks in
Nigeria. This could be partly due to the digital divide, where those directly
impacted to not have the means to connect to the digital world and spread
information first hand. This is another aspect we should be paying attention
to, not only that attention is not being paid to these areas stricken by
terror, but those living in it have no way to connect to the world that’s
outside their door.
Gladstone interviews a reporter named Alexis Okeowo, and she
mentions:
The story itself is incredibly dark and depressing and it takes a
toll on you because you are reporting about the situation that never seems to
get better, that seems to be continually ignored by people who could make it
better, the Nigerian government, and so it feels really hopeless.
Clearly, if
the Nigerian government refuses to help this issue, it’s clear that media
coverage in several forms needs to be altered from the mindset “It’s too common
to be real news”, to “It happens to often, we need to help make a change”. This way people can become truly informed of
acts of terror. Yet not only that, but to also give all of those affected by it a voice.